King Kup Candies, Inc. v. H. B. Reese Candy Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Under date of September 28, 1955, in accordance with Memorandum that day filed, the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Thereafter the defendant petitioned the Court for a reargument of the defendant’s motion to dismiss with particular reference to the applicability of Magic Foam Sales Corporation v. Mystic Foam Corporation, 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 88, and Kaufman & Ruderrnan, Inc., v. Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 86 F.Supp. 867. While not specifically mentioned, these cases were referred to in the original briefs and were fully considered.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eldon Industries, Inc. v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Universal Sewing MacHine Co. v. Standard Sewing Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Eastman Kodak Company v. Velveray CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959