State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MALLARD, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial judge committed error in failing to allow his motions for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of the evidence for the State and again at the close of all the evidence. We hold that there was ample evidence to require submission of the case to the jury.
The defendant also contends that the trial judge committed error in failing to require the defendant’s witness, Elwood Newman, to answer the following questions propounded to him by the defendant’s attorney, in the absence of the jury, after the witness had refused to answer the question,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- In Re LineberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975