Legal Opinion

State v. Ballard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1993No. 255A92PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

Defendant was tried in a noncapital trial for murder in the first degree of Marlon Branch. The trial court denied defendant’s motion that he be allowed to give evidence supporting his request for appointment of a psychiatric expert in camera and ex parte. We hold that an indigent defendant who requests that evidence supporting his motion for expert psychiatric assistance be presented in an ex parte hearing is constitutionally entitled to have such a hearing, and that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s request to be heard on this matter ex parte.

On 11 October 1990…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Rey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API