Legal Opinion
Bethea v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 2003No. 01-5396PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of counsel. It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s memorandum opinion and judgment filed October 24, 2001 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b);…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Djenasevic v. Executive United States Attorney's OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Artis-Bey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Amin-Bey v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central OfficeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bethea v. United States Parole CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003