Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Phillips v. Inhabitants of Madrid

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 12, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Facts agreed. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLibbey, J.

Assumpsit for pauper supplies furnished by the plaintiff town for the relief of Lorestein Hinkley, Ella E. Hinkley as his wife, and Barnard C. Hinkley and Harry L. Hinkley, their sons.

By the agreement of the parties, it appears that Lorestein Hinkley had his legal settlement in the defendant town; and the right to recover for what was furnished him is admitted. The right to recover for the supplies furnished Ella E. and the two sons depends upon the legality of the marriage of said Lorestein and Ella E.

By the agreed facts it appears that said Ella E. was legally married to one Wardwell, of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Van Storch v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Bullock v. BullockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. YoderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Reger v. RegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Frame v. ThormannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Smith v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API