Legal Opinion

Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 29, 2006No. 2004-5106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from the summary judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, holding that the United States breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Local America Bank of Tulsa v. United States, 52 Fed.Cl. 184 (2002) (“Local I”), and awarding $5,833,296 in damages to Local Oklahoma Bank (“Local”), Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 713 (2004) (“Local II”). Local cross-appeals from calculation of the damage award. Because the trial court properly determined liability and damages, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The facts of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  4. Southern Building Services, Inc. v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API