Legal Opinion

United States v. Salemme

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 10, 1997No. CR. 94-10287, CR. 97-10009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

On September 2,1997, the defendants filed and served a motion to dismiss all pending indictments, a memorandum of law in support of that motion, and a related affidavit of Attorney M. Cardinale, with attachments. Pursuant to the court’s Orders, the filings were made under seal because, as anticipated,- they include information derived from documents produced in discovery that are subject to a protective order prohibiting the parties from disclosing their contents without authorization of the court. See June 26,1997 Order, ¶ 9(c); August 22, 1997 Order. On September…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re Globe Newspaper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Globe Newspaper Company v. Daniel F. Pokaski, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  3. United States v. BulgerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  4. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API