Legal Opinion

United States v. Salemme

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 30, 1998No. CR. 94-10287, CR. 97-10009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

Upon careful consideration of the presentations of the parties and independent analysis, I have decided that my recusal from further participation in this case is neither necessary nor appropriate. In view of the implications of this question for this case, the reasons for this decision are described in detail in the instant Memorandum and Order and in the Memorandum and Order issued on February 13, 1998. 1

I. Summary

In the February 13, 1998 Memorandum ■ and Order, I informed the parties that I did not then believe that my recusal was required by 28…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  2. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Triple-S Vida, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
  4. Penate v. KaczmarekDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  5. Robert Olszewski, Jr., et ux. v. Barry Hutchins, individually and as former selectman, et al.District Court, D. Maine · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API