Legal Opinion

United States v. Salemme

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 13, 1998No. CR. 94-10287, CR. 97-10009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

I. Summary

Federal law requires that a presiding judge not have a personal bias or prejudice concerning any party. 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(1). It also requires that a judge decide matters based solely on the evidence presented in judicial proceedings. This means, among other things, that a judge may not preside if he: (a) “participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy,” § 455(b)(4); (b) has “personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re: Bulger v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. In re Estate of San NicolasSuperior Court of Guam · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API