Legal Opinion
People v. Laverne
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
An ordinance of the Village of Laurel Hollow in Nassau County authorizes the village Building Inspector to ‘ ‘ enter any building or premises at any reasonable hour ’ ’ in discharging his duty to ‘ ‘ enforce the provisions of ’ ’ the Building Zone Ordinance of the village (art. X, § 10.1). The ordinance provides that a violation of its mandate is disorderly conduct with a prescribed punishment (§ 10.2).
Defendant Laverne is a designer of furniture, fabrics, wall coverings and similar materials. The corporation of which he is president, Laverne Originals, Inc., is the owner of a large dwelling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Frank v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- District of Columbia v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ohio Ex Rel. Eaton v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. DoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Corning v. Village of Laurel HollowNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. TinnenyNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Laverne v. CorningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.