Legal Opinion

Corning v. Village of Laurel Hollow

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1979PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

The question here is whether certain former high-ranking officials of the Village of Laurel Hollow are entitled to reimbursement from the village of their costs, disbursements and legal fees incurred in asserting a successful defense to a civil rights action brought against them as a result of acts performed in their official capacities. Reversing Special Term, the Appellate Division held that in the absence of express authority to employ counsel, plaintiffs were not entitled to recover legal fees from the village. There should be an affirmance. Without…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Cahn v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Mercurio v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. New Windsor Volunteer Ambulance Corps, Inc. v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. New Windsor Volunteer Ambulance Corps, Inc. v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API