Legal Opinion

People v. Dory

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1983PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

The discretion granted a Trial Judge by the authorization of “other appropriate action” contained in CPL 240.70 (subd 1) includes vacatur of a suppression order entered by a hearing Judge of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the suppression order having been predicated not upon any Fourth Amendment violation, but upon the People’s denial of possession of any suppressible evidence or testimony. There was, moreover, sufficient evidence independent of that of the accomplices to meet the corroboration requirement of CPL 60.22 (subd 1) and the Trial Judge’s charge adequately…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. BoodleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Rowland Dory v. Commissioner of Correction of the State of New York and Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. People v. KonigsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API