Mckay Buick, Inc. v. Love
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
FINCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment wherein the trial court held that § 150.040, RSMo Supp.1976,1 a new statute enacted in 1976 to impose an ad valorem tax on new motor vehicles, is constitutional and that § 137.115, RSMo Supp.19732 is applicable to the valuation established in § 150.040 in determining the assessed valuation to which the applicable tax rate should be applied. Defendants appealed to this court which has jurisdiction because construction of a revenue law and construction of provisions of the Missouri Constitution are involved. We reverse for the reason…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Viquesney v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Hull v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Xerox Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- McKay Buick, Inc. v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Sunshine Enterprises of Missouri, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States/Marriott Hotels, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Planned Industrial Expansion Authority v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. HaasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rekart v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.