Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. State Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 10, 1975No. 58850PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This ease involves tax assessments for the year 1972 on personal property belonging to Xerox Corporation and Mohawk Data Sciences Corporation and leased to users in the City of St. Louis and in Buchanan County, Clay County, Jasper County, Pulaski County, St. Charles County and St. Louis County. It was stipulated by the parties in the appeals before the State Tax Commission that the transcript in the Xerox case should be regarded as the formal record for all cases. The Conclusions of Law filed by the Commission in the Xerox case are as follows:

“The sole question in this case is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Wood v. Wagner Electric CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hermel, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. St. Louis County v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Xerox Corp. v. TraversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Aspenhof Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Mckay Buick, Inc. v. LoveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API