Legal Opinion

Planned Industrial Expansion Authority v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1981No. 61897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

The trial court entered what it designated as a Partial Summary Judgment wherein it declared that § 392.080, RSMo (as amended by Laws 1974, p. 892, § 1), was unconstitutional and ordered that said judgment be considered final for purposes of appeal; and, all parties agree that our present review is limited to those constitutional questions flowing therefrom.

The suit itself involves a dispute among the parties1 as to the ownership of portions of certain streets and alleys within the City.

Prior to the month of June 1978, PIE and LCRA developed a plan whereby several blocks in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Plaza Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Lionberger v. TolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. City of Springfield v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Century 21-Mabel O. Pettus, Inc. v. City of JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Missouri Municipal League, City of Springfield, and Richard Sheets v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. Central Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Jefferson CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API