Planned Industrial Expansion Authority v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
The trial court entered what it designated as a Partial Summary Judgment wherein it declared that § 392.080, RSMo (as amended by Laws 1974, p. 892, § 1), was unconstitutional and ordered that said judgment be considered final for purposes of appeal; and, all parties agree that our present review is limited to those constitutional questions flowing therefrom.
The suit itself involves a dispute among the parties1 as to the ownership of portions of certain streets and alleys within the City.
Prior to the month of June 1978, PIE and LCRA developed a plan whereby several blocks in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BuderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Plaza Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- State ex rel. Lionberger v. TolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- City of Springfield v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Century 21-Mabel O. Pettus, Inc. v. City of JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Missouri Municipal League, City of Springfield, and Richard Sheets v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Central Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Jefferson CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.