Legal Opinion

Blount v. Smith

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-750PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs were convicted, in state summary proceedings, of fraudulently receiving unemployment compensation benefits. As a result of these convictions, Plaintiffs, although otherwise qualified, were declared ineligible to receive benefits for a period of one year pursuant to Section 402(g) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Act, 43 P.S. § 802(g). This action challenges the validity of § 402(g) on constitutional and statutory grounds. Both Plaintiffs and Defendants seek summary judgment. Although we decide the constitutional questions adversely to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. G. Davidson, A/K/A John Doe v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Cardenas v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Losey v. RobertsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1986
  4. Cyprus v. DiskinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Dively v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API