Legal Opinion

Cyprus v. Diskin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1996No. Civ. A. 95-1573PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This case arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff, Norman Cyprus, asserts that his constitutional rights were violated as a result of an arrest that assertedly occurred without probable cause. He has named as defendants two state police officers, Trooper Richard Diskin and Corporal Steven Furlong, and the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police, Glenn Walp. The defendants have now filed a motion for summary judgment.

I. Factual Background

The following recitation of undisputed facts is derived from the complaint and from the parties’ submissions.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Britton v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  2. R & B FALCON CORP. v. American Exploration Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API