Cyprus v. Diskin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This case arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff, Norman Cyprus, asserts that his constitutional rights were violated as a result of an arrest that assertedly occurred without probable cause. He has named as defendants two state police officers, Trooper Richard Diskin and Corporal Steven Furlong, and the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police, Glenn Walp. The defendants have now filed a motion for summary judgment.
I. Factual Background
The following recitation of undisputed facts is derived from the complaint and from the parties’ submissions.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Britton v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- R & B FALCON CORP. v. American Exploration Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001