Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Brinkley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2007No. Docket No. 269725PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this grandparent visitation case, this Court originally vacated the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion for relief from an order denying their petition for grandparent visitation and remanded the case to the trial court for consideration of the merits of appellants’ motion.1 In lieu of granting leave to appeal, our Supreme Court remanded the case to this Court “for plenary consideration of the grandparents’ constitutional issue.” Brinkley v Brinkley, 477 Mich 1029 (2007). We hold that MCL 722.27b(5) does not violate appellants’ due process or equal protection rights. We remand…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Harrold v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Frame v. NehlsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Schmude Oil, Inc. v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. John Doe 1 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. John Doe 1 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Melanie Throop v. Robert DevriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API