Legal Opinion

Frame v. Nehls

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 102139, Calendar No. 11PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

In this case, we interpret MCL 722.27b; MSA 25.312(7b), the section of the Child Custody Act, MCL 722.21 et seq.; MSA 25.312(1) et seq., that involves the right of grandparents to seek visitation of their grandchildren.1 We granted leave to determine whether the grandparent visitation statute entitles appellee to seek court-ordered visitation, and whether it unconstitutionally deprives appellee-grandfather equal protection of the law.

The Child Custody Act, MCL 722.21 et seq.; MSA 25.312(1) et seq., does not authorize an order of visitation because the grandchild’s father is not deceased, and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Crego v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Harvey v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Zdrojewski v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API