McLeay v. Crane

Hill, C, J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion fcr continuance.

2. While the fact that the names of some of the jurors in a justice’s court did not appear on the jury lis»- may have been good ground for challenge before the jury had been impaneled, yet where nc objection was made before the trial and no ruling made thereon, it can not be taken ad*816vantage of-by certiorari after verdict. Mitchell v. Bradberry, 76 Ga. 15. This objection is propter defectum, and comes too late after verdict. Jordan v. State, 119 Ga. 443 (43 S. E. 679).

Decided November 27, 1912. Rehearing…