Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Bradberry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Jury and Jurors. Justice Courts. Certiorari. Before F. F. Juhan, Esq., Judge pro hac vice. Gwinnett Superior Court. March Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Blandford, Justice.

The defendant in error brought his action against plaintiff in error in a justice’s court to recover damages by reason of the fact that the plaintiff- in error had killed, or caused to be killed, certain sheep, which sheep had broken into Mitchell’s field, the same not being enclosed by a lawful fence. The justices rendered judgment in favor of Bradberry. Mitchell appealed to a jury. ■ On the trial before the jury, there was no objection made to the justices as to how the jury was constituted, and no judgment of the justices rendered thereon. The jury found for Brad-berry,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. SneadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Ferguson v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. McLeay v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API