Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1904PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Indictment for burglary. Before Judge Eelton. Bibb superior court. January 5, 1904.

1Opinion of the Court

Lamar*, J.

1. The time and place of the commission of a crime must always appear. While it is best to make specific proof of the date, yet that the offense was committed within the statute of limitations may be established by circumstantial or indirect evidence. What is sufficient must be determined by the special facts of each case. In Tipton v. State, 119 Ga. 304, it *444is stated that where a month is referred to, it- will generally be understood to be of the current year, unless from the connection this appears to be impossible. And if this trial had taken place in January, 1904, it is evident…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Costly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  3. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Tipton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Lumpkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Gordon v. Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. State v. PonthierIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API