Legal Opinion

United States v. Ho

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided August 20, 2009No. Criminal 08-00337 JMSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS 4 AND 6 OF THE SECOND SUPERCEDING INDICTMENT; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS 5 AND 7 OF THE SECOND SUPERCED-ING INDICTMENT; AND (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEVER CIVIL RIGHTS COUNTS FROM WITNESS TAMPERING COUNTS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO BIFURCATE TRIAL

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Second Superseding Indictment (“SSI”), filed March 11, 2009, charges Defendant Robert Tam Ho (“Defendant”) with three counts of unlawful use of force under color of law in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Counts…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Arthur Andersen LLP v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API