Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2001No. Civ.A 01-1351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks benefits under a group disability policy issued by defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) to plaintiffs employer Sears, Roebuck and Co. 1 The complaint, which alleges breach of contract, and violations of Pennsylvania’s bad faith statute, 42 Pa. Cons.Stat.Ann. § 8371, and its Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 73, § 201-1 et seq., was originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Metropolitan removed the action to this court on the ground that the claims involved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Gluck v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Scheibler v. Highmark Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Termini v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. Haase v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Reisch-Elvin v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API