Murphy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks benefits under a group disability policy issued by defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) to plaintiffs employer Sears, Roebuck and Co. 1 The complaint, which alleges breach of contract, and violations of Pennsylvania’s bad faith statute, 42 Pa. Cons.Stat.Ann. § 8371, and its Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 73, § 201-1 et seq., was originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Metropolitan removed the action to this court on the ground that the claims involved…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Gluck v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Scheibler v. Highmark Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Termini v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Haase v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Reisch-Elvin v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.