Ackerman v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN AT ISSUE IS GOVERNED BY ERISA; DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 8-2) SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; PLAINTIFF DIRECTED TO FILE, WITHIN 10 DAYS OF DATE, NOTICE OF WHETHER SHE INTENDS TO PROCEED WITH HER BREACH OF CONTRACT CAUSE OF ACTION, RE-CHARACTERIZED HEREIN AS ONE ARISING UNDER ERISA
RICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Joyce Ackerman (“Ackerman”), along with her husband and son, filed the underlying civil action in the Montgomery…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Kinzer v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Kmatz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Harvey v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2005
- Termini v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.