United States v. Mark Albritton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1ConcurrenceKaren LeCRAFT Henderson, Circuit Judge
I write separately because I believe Albritton’s departure request, made for the first time on appeal, is not reviewable. We have never held, nor should we, that a defendant who does not even make a departure request at. sentencing is entitled to plain error review.
Congress has granted appellate courts a “narrow scope of review,” Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 199, 112 S.Ct. 1112, 1118, 117 L.Ed.2d 341 (1992), which entitles the defendant to appeal his sentence if it was imposed in violation of law or as a result of the incorrect application of the guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Carlos Saro, United States of America v. Cornelio Cabrera-BaezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Shannon O. Pinnick A/K/A Scott A. BishopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Larry P. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Eduardo OrtezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.