Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2002No. 00-2916-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. Glenn Davis (Davis) petitioned this court to review a court of appeals' decision, which held that, because he intended to introduce expert psychological testimony at trial pursuant to State v. Richard A.P., 223 Wis. 2d 777, 589 N.W.2d 674 (Ct. App. 1998), he effectively waived his right against self-incrimination and could be ordered to submit to a psychological examination by a state-selected expert. Richard A.R evidence is evidence introduced by the defendant to show that he lacked the psychological characteristics of a sex offender and therefore was unlikely to have committed the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Steele v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lee v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. KleserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Arents v. ANR Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. OstranderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API