Legal Opinion
Kistler v. Cleveland (In re Cleveland)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided October 20, 2006No. Bankruptcy No. 05-18578-B-13; Adversary Proc. No. 06-1108PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*256MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTRY OF DEFAULT
W. RICHARD LEE, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding posits the question, “What happens to an objection to chapter 7 discharge after the case is converted to chapter 13?” The United States Trustee (“UST”) filed this adversary proceeding to deny the Debtor’s discharge, or dismiss the case, based on allegations arising under 11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b) and 727(a).1 The Debtor failed to file a responsive pleading to the UST’s complaint, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: Mark Alan ShoemakerUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019