Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Miller
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
An “agency-shop” arrangement permits a union, obliged to act on behalf of all employees in the bargaining unit, to charge nonunion workers their fair share of the costs of the representation. The purposes for which a union may spend the “agency fee” paid by nonmembers, however, are circumscribed by the First Amendment (when public employers are involved) and the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or Railway Labor Act (RLA) (when private employers subject to their provisions are involved). In Teachers v. Hudson, 475 U. S. 292 (1986), we held that the First Amendment requires public-employee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Holt v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Hulley Enterprises Ltd. v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Prescott v. County of El DoradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.