Legal Opinion

In re: Mark Alan Shoemaker

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 2019No. CC-18-1020-KuFLUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED JUL 1 2019 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. CC-18-1020-KuFL MARK ALAN SHOEMAKER, Bk. No. 1:14-bk-15182-GM Debtors. Adv. No. 1:14-ap-01206-GM MARK ALAN SHOEMAKER, Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR REGION 16, Appellee. Argued and Submitted on June 20, 2019 at Pasadena, California Filed – July 1, 2019 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California * This disposition is not appropriate for publication. Although it…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API