Legal Opinion

Pinner v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1983No. 8228SC51PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the court erred in severing the issue of prescriptive easement and proceeding to trial on that issue alone. The court expressly based its decision on these factors: (1) an action for eminent domain involves the assessment of damages, whereas the primary issue regarding prescriptive easement is whether a right-of-way has been established; (2) only if the jury finds no prescriptive easement does an issue of damages for trespass arise, and (3) the jury could be “tainted” by evidence admissible as to one issue only.

The decision to sever issues is in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Potts v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Johnson v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benton v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Mehovic v. MehovicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Geoscience Grp., Inc. v. Waters Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Washburn v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Barbecue Inn, Inc. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API