Legal Opinion

Ingemarson v. Coffey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1907No. 5462; No. 3132 C. APublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Boulder County. Hon. James E. Garrigues, Judge. Action by Henry N. Coffey against L. Ingemarson and N. J. Nelson. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

In this case the appellants say that the pleadings are in proper form and that the verdict is justified by the evidence, but that the jury was improperly instructed. It appears that in the Gold Hill mining district, in Boulder county, there is a mineral lode *409which for several years had been located and abandoned by different people. These various locators had driven an adit upon the lead. After the abandonment of the property this adit had caved in and was filled with earth and rock and overgrown with weeds. Upon January 1st, 1903, appellant Nelson placed upon this lea'd, near the adit above…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCann v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Rio Grande Southern Railroad v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Rohn v. Iron Chief Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Eureka Exploration Co. v. Tom Moore Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API