Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Hight

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923No. 14117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

This is an action upon a 'warranty deed by the grantee against the grantor for damages for an alleged shortage of acreage in a tract of land conveyed. The action is based upon the implied warranty contained in the deed. The plaintiff recovered1 judgment for $770, and the defendants appeal. The several errors assigned are presented in the plaintiffs in errors’ brief under three separate headings: (1) The sufficiency of the petition; (2) the insufficiency of the amendment and the evidence; and (8) the instructions of the court.

It is alleged in the petition that in consideration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Kibby v. Cubie, Heimann & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Maston v. Glen Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Purdy v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API