Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Hullender

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1940No. 27946PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proof of the fact that a locomotive engine had written on it the words "Southern Railway Company," unsupported by any other fact, was insufficient to authorize the inference that it was owned by the Southern Railway Company, and that it was being operated at the time of the injury by employees of the Southern Railway Company engaged in its business. It was error to overrule the motion for new trial.

DECIDED MARCH 15, 1940.

J. C. Hullender brought suit against the Southern Railway Company to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him on account of the negligence of the defendant. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dawson Motor Co. v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Edgeworth v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. Minter v. KentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Barnum & Bailey Shows Inc. v. HimmelweitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Clower v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harper v. SamplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. MalcomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. De Bord v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API