Legal Opinion
Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 25, 1966No. 41930PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
We affirm. The basis of the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was that the plaintiff had utterly failed to prove the agency of the driver of the cab. It is to be noted that every allegation in the petition by which his agency was asserted was expressly denied, and ownership of the vehicle by the defendant was denied.
There was no proof of the ownership of the vehicle, and no proof that it bore the vehicle license plate as alleged or any license plate issued to the defendant. There was no proof that the driver, Downing, was in any way employed by the defendant,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dawson Motor Co. v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Larkins v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- King v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Executive Committee of Baptist Convention v. FergusonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Minter v. KentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Harper v. SamplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Crowell v. Clay Hyder Trucking LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- RED TOP CAB COMPANY, INC. v. HyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Loudermilk Enterprises, Inc. v. HurtigCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CumbieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.