Legal Opinion
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Jack Leroy Gallardo, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1985No. 84-1167, 84-1176PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The United States appeals from the district court’s dismissal under the Speedy Trial Act (STA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (1982), of its indictment charging Jack Leroy Gallardo, Jr., with interference with commerce by threats or violence, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982), and embezzlement from a savings and loan association, 18 U.S.C. § 651 (1982). The district court dismissed Gallardo’s indictment based upon violation of the STA’s 70-day indictment-to-trial limitation provision, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). 1 The government contends that in reaching its decision, the district court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Mitchell JanikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Frank J. MaybusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Patrick Arthur Castro, United States of America v. Herbert Thomas CotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Joseph M. PalombaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Freeman D. Carter, A/K/A Daniel Brady, James Patrick Daly, and William CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Deborah Ann StoudenmireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.