Legal Opinion
United States v. Patrick Arthur Castro, United States of America v. Herbert Thomas Cotter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1989No. 87-5227, 87-5240PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
After a ten-week jury trial, Patrick Arthur Castro and Herbert Thomas Cotter were each convicted of one count of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; seventeen counts of misapplication of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656; and five counts of causing false entries to be made in bank records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005. Cotter also was convicted of three counts of submitting false loan applications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. Both Castro and Cotter appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
Castro was a vice president and commercial loan officer at Mitsui…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.