Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Company v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 4, 1992No. 92-1334PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
This matter is before this court on appeal from an order entered April 15, 1992, dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without prejudice to the appellant American Cyanamid Company pursuing its claim in a state court. We will affirm.
The facts on which Cyanamid relies and which we will treat as not being in essential dispute are as follows. Cyanamid, through its Lederle Laboratories Division, manufactures DTP, a vaccine for immunization of infants and children against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lunderstadt v. ColafellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Thomas Deiro v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mechanical Technology Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London v. United Parcel Service of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Sassy Doll Creations, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Siren, Inc. v. Estes Express LinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Emerson Electric Supply Company v. Estes Express Lines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Kemper Insurance Companies v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.