Legal Opinion

Burr v. Redhead, Norton, Lathrop Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1897No. 7519PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of York couuty. Tried below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was instituted in the county court of York county by the defendant in error, hereinafter designated the “company,” to recover an amount alleged to be its due from the plaintiffs in error on account of a number of bicycles sold by the company to plaintiffs in error. The balance claimed to be due on the account after the deduction of a payment of $100, was $443.75. The case was in the course of the litigation appealed to the district court of York county, where, in the petition filed, the claim was set forth of the amount due on the account as we have just stated it. The answer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Omaha Coal, Coke & Lime Co. v. FayNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sycamore Marsh Harvester Manufacturing Co. v. SturmNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Young v. FilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. C. Aultman & Co. v. StoutNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. William Deering & Co. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garbark v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Yoder v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Springer v. HenthornNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Long v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ellis v. RiddickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API