Legal Opinion

William Deering & Co. v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Custer county. Tried below before Hamer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This action was brought in the court below apparently to recover $50 penalty provided for in the act of 1885. The court below, however, in striking out certain parts of the petition, held “ that the plaintiffs (defendants in error) could not recover the $50 penalty mentioned in the first cause of action because the statute was unconstitutional.”

This ruling is not before this court for review and has not been discussed by the attorneys for either party, and it would be improper to express an opinion thereon.

The case proceeded to trial as a common law action to recover for actual damages…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Uhlig v. BarnumNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gibson v. Koutsky-Brennan-Vana Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Burr v. Redhead, Norton, Lathrop Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Dixon v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API