Legal Opinion

East St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co. v. Zink

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 15, 1907Published

Action in case for - personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. R. D. W. Holder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Higbee

This was a suit originally brought against appellant and the East St. Louis Railway Company, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by appellee, by reason of the negligence of appellant. There was afterwards an amended declaration filed, containing nine counts. Appellant filed a plea of the general issue and a special plea of the Statute of Limitations. To the latter a demurrer was sustained, and appellant stood by its plea, and went to trial. After all the evidence was in, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty, as to counts 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Appellee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Day v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Mitchell v. HindmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Toluca, Marquette & Northern Railway Co. v. HawsIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. McDonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API