Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Lee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henderson county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice SheldoN

This was an action brought by the administratrix of the estate of Darius B. Lee, deceased, under the act of 1853, on behalf of herself and children, as the widow and next of kin of the deceased, for damages resulting to them from his death, charged to have been caused by the carelessness and negligence of the defendants below in operating their engine and train, and occasioning a collision between the same and the deceased while driving his team along the highway and over the railroad track of the defendants at a public crossing.

The charge of carelessness alleged in the declaration was, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luby v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Thallhimer v. BrinckerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. SweeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Keokuk Packet Co. v. HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Waterman v. PeetIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. FlannaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Sinopoli v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Baier v. SelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Denver City Tramway Co. v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API