People v. Acosta
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
After a preliminary hearing defendant and respondent was charged by information with the crime of having in his possession a narcotic, without describing it. After information filed in the superior court, defendant’s counsel moved to set it aside under section 995 of the Penal Code and the motion was granted. The People appealed.
The question before the trial court was whether defendant. was illegally committed, or committed without reasonable or probable cause. It is defendant’s claim that the principal evidence against him at the preliminary examination was obtained in violation of his…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Dunn v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR EUREKA JUDICIAL DISTRICTCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. GoveaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. PrietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Arata v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.