Legal Opinion
Basketball Marketing Co. v. FX Digital Media, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 11, 2007No. 06-2216, 06-3274UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
•McKEE, Circuit Judge.
The Basketball Marketing Company, Inc. d/b/a AND 1 and BMC Players, Inc. (collectively “AND 1” or “Plaintiffs”) appeal the verdict the trial court entered in favor of Tim Gittens a/k/a “Headache,” in this trademark infringement action, as well as the attorney’s fees the court awarded to Gittens. 1 For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the verdict in favor of Gittens, but reverse the order awarding Gittens attorney’s fees.
I
Inasmuch as we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with this case, we need not set forth the factual or procedural background…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Interpace Corporation v. Lapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown & Brown, Inc. v. ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Delaware Valley Financial Group, Inc. v. Principal Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Dentsply Sirona Inc. v. Net32, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- INVENTEL PRODUCTS, LLC v. LIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019