Cavanaugh v. Jackson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The record shows that in December, 1880, and long prior thereto, the plaintiff was in possession of the Coats place, which he now owns, and the defendant, Jackson, was in possession of an adjoining ranch, known as the Beaughan place. A dispute having arisen as to the boundary line between the two ranches, a surveyor was employed by plaintiff and defendant to make a survey and establish the true line. Such survey was made in December, 1880. The plaintiff testified as follows: “ Jackson had this land fenced up for a long time prior to the first day of September, 1886, — maybe four or five years…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blair v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
- Houston v. SneedTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Jordan v. DeatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
- Silvarer v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Price v. De ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Lewis v. OgramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Loustalot v. McKeelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. McNuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.