Legal Opinion

People v. McNutt

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1892No. 20858PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Appellant was charged with the offense of an assault with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit murder, and was convicted of the lesser offense of an assault with a deadly weapon. For a reversal of the judgment, he insists that the court erred in not instructing the jury upon the question of his good character for peace and quiet, he having introduced evidence to that point. It would be unfair and unjust to the people and the court to reverse a judgment and order a new trial because the court did not instruct the jury upon every conceivable phase or principle of law directly or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Culpepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. People v. TugwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. SwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API