Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Maxey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1929No. 3522PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

This is an action on a release bond given under the provisions of articles 279 and 280 of the Code of Practice.

Originally, there was a controversy between plaintiff and defendant over the ownership of a motor truck. Plaintiff brought suit asking that he be decreed the owner of it and had it sequestered in the hands of defendant, executing bond under article 276 of the Code of Practice. Whereupon defendant had the seizure released on a forthcoming bond, under article 279 of the Code of Practice, the condition of the bond being as follows:

“Therefore, the condition of the above obligation is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welsh v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
  2. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. John M. Parker Co. v. E. Martin & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. King v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  5. Albert Pick & Co. v. Dickinsons, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Charity Hospital of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Port Finance Co. v. BerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API