Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Barrow

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1845PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of Terrebonne; Nicholh, J. The court erred in striking out the plea of payment. 11 La., 216. The defendants were not put in default. Code of Practice, arts. 279, 280. Civil Code, arts. 2113, 2122; 6 Mart. N. S., 624. 3 La., 99.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

This suit is instituted upon a bond given by the defendant, Barrow, in order to be allowed to keep in his possession the property sequestered in the case of Welsh v. Shields et al., decided last year by this court, upon which property the plaintiff claimed a privilege, which was subsequently recognized by us in our judgment. By the decree of this court, it was ordered, that the amount of the judgment rendered below against the defen- ■ dant Shields, be satisfied, by privilege, out of the proceeds of the properly sequestered in due course of law.

The condition of the bond sued on specifies,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Howard Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Everett v. Hue & AarnesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Central Sav. B. T. Co. v. Oil Field Supply S. Mat.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Albert Pick & Co. v. Dickinsons, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API