Legal Opinion

Prickett v. Foreign Exchange, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1990No. 11802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

Dan Prickett brought suit for damages and/or the rescission of an automobile sales contract, alleging that the seller, Foreign Exchange, Inc. had violated the Odometer Rollback and Disclosure Act, R.C. 4549.41 et seq. The trial court sustained Foreign Exchange’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Prickett could not show that the dealership knew that the odometer reading was incorrect. Prickett appeals this judgment, asserting as his sole assignment of error that the statutes in question impose strict liability, thus not requiring a demonstration of actual knowledge.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Flint v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Bob McDorman ChevroletOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Moon v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Hughes v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Popovich v. Southern Park Pontiac & Subaru, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API