Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1991No. 12-89-15PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hadley, Judge.
Charles E. Miller, defendant-appellant, appeals from a judgment entered against him by the Common Pleas Court of Putnam County in the amount of $4,800. After a bench trial, the trial court found Miller, owner of a used-car dealership, in violation of the Odometer Rollback and Disclosure Act, R.C. 4549.41 et seq., and, particularly, R.C. 4549.46, by selling to Beatrice Hughes, plaintiff-appellee, a vehicle which had traveled more miles than was reflected on the odometer without first disclosing that fact.
The parties entered the following stipulation of facts which are taken from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coventry Towers, Inc. v. City of StrongsvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Celebrezze v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Flint v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Baek v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Prickett v. Foreign Exchange, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Ohio Ex Rel v. Midway Motor Sales, 07ap-744 (6-10-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Popovich v. Southern Park Pontiac & Subaru, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. Burrell, 1-07-52 (4-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008